The curriculua of both schools are nearly identical. State licensing agencies and most hospitals and residency programs recognize the degrees as equivalent. In other words, Ostepathic doctors are legally and professionally equlivalent to medical doctors. The admission requirements for osteopathic medical schools tend to be lower than for allopathic, but not by much and this is changing. The important difference between the two types of schools is that osteopathic medical schools have a holistic perspective on practice of medicine based on a belief in treating the "whole patient" (mind-body-spirit) and the primacy of the musculoskeletal system in human health and the utility of osteopathic manipulative treatment.
Osteopathic medical schools have a reputation for looking at the applicant, not just his or her statistics, and therefore likely to admit nontraditional applicants. The average age of entering osteopathic students has been 26 years (vs. allopathic medical school's 24).
The main disadvantage of choosing osteopathic medicine is that that you may find yourself educating patients and colleagues about your degree and credentials (i.e., that a DO is the equivalent of an MD). Also, some have viewed areas of osteopathic medicine as "quackery," so you might find yourself defending your profession to a few muckrakers.
